Scoop -- the swiss army chainsaw of content management
Front Page · Everything · News · Code · Help! · Wishlist · Project · Scoop Sites · Dev Notes · Latest CVS changes · Development Activities
About Scoop
Code
Menu
· create account
· faq
· search
· report bugs
· Scoop Administrators Guide
· Scoop Box Exchange

Scoop Site Scroller: Get one yourself!
Scoop
The swiss army chainsaw of Content Managment.

Scoop Site Designers
The SAG
Want to do something with Scoop but not sure how? Try the Scoop Admin Guide!
All developers for hire

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Poll
Spammers are to be:
· Beaten 27%
· Stabbed 25%
· Shot 19%
· Hung 22%
· Drawn 19%
· Quartered 16%
· handed over to Jack Bauer as terrorists with vital information 33%
· Really, *really* hurt 22%
· - 2%
· heralded as good and just marketers just trying to make a living 27%

Votes: 36 | Comments: 10
Results | Other Polls

Recent Comments
· sdsd (robinjack)
· sdsd (robinjack)
· sdsd (robinjack)
· Agree! (vemwrites)
· sdsd (robinjack)
· Seo (robinjack)
· Seo (robinjack)
· sdsd (robinjack)
· sdsd (robinjack)
· sdsd (robinjack)

Code

Older Stories...

What is Scoop
Scoop is a "collaborative media application". It falls somewhere between a content management system, a web bulletin board system, and a weblog. Scoop is designed to enable your website to become a community. It empowers your visitors to be the producers of the site, contributing news and discussion, and making sure that the signal remains high. More >>

Check out what other people have done with Scoop.

New Scoop Sites
rudepeople.com in need of a makeover
949 comments, 0 new
by rudedude, Announcements

New Music Site ... in Scoop
991 comments, 0 new
by MightyD, Announcements

Trees and Things is Coming Out
741 comments, 0 new
by 3fingerspointback, Announcements

TalkLeft Moves to Scoop
636 comments, 0 new
by TalkLeft, Announcements

SciScoop Science Forum
518 comments, 0 new
by sciencebase, Announcements

New Site: "Field Gulls" Unofficial Seattle Seahawks Blog
493 comments, 0 new
by Paul Shrug, Announcements

More New Scoop Sites...

Where can I get Scoop
You can download the latest release tarball: scoop_1.1.8.tar.gz

You can grab the nightly build. Note: This is generated automatically from the current CVS, and may not be reliable! Get that here: scoop-1.1-nightly.tar.gz

The developers strongly recommend CVS as the primary way to obtain Scoop, since releases tend to have pretty long delays between them. If you have CVS installed, do the following:

cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@ scoop.versionhost.com:/cvs/scoop login

cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@ scoop.versionhost.com:/cvs/scoop co scoop

The above is two commands; each one must be on a single line. When prompted for a password for anonymous, enter 'anonymous' (without the quotes). For more CVS info, "Open Source Development with CVS" is an excellent online reference.

Where can I get help
There are several sources of information and support for Scoop. The first place to look is the scoop-help mailing list. You can browse the archives, or join the list. If you want to post a question, joining the list is strongly recommended. You can also join the #scoop IRC channel on SlashNET.

For documentation, there is the (largely complete) Scoop administrator's guide. You can also read the current README and INSTALL files, from Scoop WebCVS (username and password are both "anonymous"). The admin guide is also included with Scoop, in the doc/ directory.

If you have new feature ideas or requests, or descriptions of something you're working on for Scoop, this site is the place to submit them. You can also search this site for information. If you want to get your hands dirty, or have any questions about developing for Scoop, there is also the Scoop-dev list. You can browse the archives, or join the list.

Bug reports and patches should be filed on the Scoop Bug Muncher.

If you have any problems with this site or your user account, e-mail the Admin

Vote For Scoop
Vote for Scoop on O'Reilly's OSDir.com

Most Hotlisted Stories
· Intro To Scoop Development (650 comments) by 29 users
· So, you've installed Scoop (555 comments) by 14 users
· How to install Scoop in Windows 2000/XP (350 comments) by 11 users
· scoop and mod_gzip (1038 comments) by 9 users
· Announcing the hotlist_flex box (914 comments) by 7 users
· HOWTO: create a new opcode without writing any code (664 comments) by 7 users
· Postgres Scoop (491 comments) by 7 users
· A Proposal: Wikis for Scoop (580 comments) by 6 users
· where does one post for developers? how about a job area? (770 comments) by 5 users
· Spammers (442 comments) by 5 users

Censorship feature for autors Feature Requests
By Sinsemihl , Section Code []
Posted on Sun Sep 19, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
We are currently setting up a new Scoop site (looove that piece of software!) that acts as a 'shadow site' to an existing one, a place where (trusted) users can vent steam, rant and have fun without really hurting anyone. Still, I don't want anything offensive to leak into the realm of those that are not logged in, if only for legal reasons, and I pretty much know how I want it be done. Here, I am asking experienced folks for a hint on the best implementation of a way to hide arbitrary parts of posts at the author's discretion.

(17 comments, 256 words in story) Full Story >>

Time to clean up the HTML code? Feature Requests
By boxed , Section Code []
Posted on Fri Sep 17, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
The scoop engine is very powerful and flexible but it still uses antique non-valid HTML without CSS which increases the bandwidth costs of the server unneccessarily while making it harder to make skins and making it impossible to use the site from certain devices with small screens.

(18 comments, 278 words in story) Full Story >>

Box: rdf_feeds_boxed Boxes
By phill , Section Code []
Posted on Tue Jun 22, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
I'm not particularly fond of the one rdf box with all the links lumped inside. I had played around with a system to seperate the rdf feeds into boxes and then allow the user to determine their position as well as turn them off from the page they were displayed on. This is a slimed down version of that idea, minus the arrangement options.

There are four parts: rdf_feeds_boxed, rdf_feeds_single, box_rdf_box, and hiderdf_box.

(12 comments, 1054 words in story) Full Story >>

User Prefs New Code
By janra , Section Code []
Posted on Sun May 16, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
Well, I'm getting tired of waiting for somebody to test my patches so 1.0 be released before starting new development, so I say to hell with waiting.

Here is my plan for re-doing user prefs so they're easy for admins to customize and easy for developers to add to.

(12 comments, 823 words in story) Full Story >>

Comments: easy way to go one level up Feature Requests
By paugq , Section Code []
Posted on Thu May 06, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
Imagine you see an attractive-titled comment and it's level 5. It renders to be very interesting comment, and now you'd like to read the comment in level 4 this comment is answering. The only way you can do it is going to the story, then clicking the comment in level 4.

(8 comments, 109 words in story) Full Story >>

Need help. Feature Requests
By Vladinator , Section Code []
Posted on Sat Apr 10, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
If there is one thing I would change about scoop, it is this:

(9 comments, 101 words in story) Full Story >>

autoformatting Feature Requests
By j1mmy , Section Code []
Posted on Sun Mar 28, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
I ran across this perl script that's basically a more robust version of scoop's autoformat, if it interests anyone.

(5 comments, 32 words in story) Full Story >>

Semi password protect scoop site Feature Requests
By singing fish , Section Code []
Posted on Mon Feb 02, 2004 at 12:00:00 PM PST
I have a location based scoop site which will be used by a small number of academic researchers, and I'd like to make it so that only individuals who are logged in can access the scoop portion of the site, effectively disabling anonymous users. I really don't want to use .htaccess files as I don't want my users to have to log in every time they use the site. I will only have a small number of users, so I'm happy to hand roll the account creation process. What I was thinking was that:
  • http://here.mydomain.edu.au is accessible to all.
  • http://here.mydomain.edu.au/login.html provides a page to login to the scoop part of the site.
  • All requests to http://here.mydomain.edu.au/scoop/* from non-logged in users get redirected to the login page.

I've had a look at Scoop.pm, which seems to be the place to modify the code in, but I'm really not sure where to start the modificatoin process.
I tried to post a message to scoop help several times, but was thwarted by the mailing list telling me they couldn't verify my email address, so I've posted here instead. Thanks for any help.
Kieren

(12 comments) Comment >>

<< Previous 8 Next 8 >>

Hosted by ScoopHost.com Powered by Scoop
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1999 The Management

create account | faq | search